Omsk State Universities n. F. M Dostoevsky
Omsk State Universities n. F. M Dostoevsky (the Department of Theory and History of State and Law, Associate Professor)
Russian Federation
UDK 340.155.4 Правовая система парламентской демократической республики
Direct democracy appeared in the United States back in the colonial period. However, when the country became sovereign in the late XVIII century, the founding fathers gave preference to representative democracy in order to prevent the mob rule. This research traces the history of various institutions of direct democracy in the United States. The late XIX – early XX centuries saw an era of progressivism in the United States: civil society struggled against negative social, political, and legal phenomena. Implementation of referendums, general direct elections, recalls of officials, etc., into the legal system seemed a perfect solution. In the early XX century, these institutions were enshrined in the legislation of some Western states and proved rather effective. The so-called second wave of direct democracy occurred after 1950s, and institutions of direct democracy became even more widespread. This process reached its peak in the late XX – early XXI centuries. As a result, they predominate in the current US legislation. The USA are currently going through a further rise in direct democracy, which is even more implemented into the legal system. The American experience of direct democracy is of considerable interest to Russia as it may help to improve the domestic state mechanisms of making socially important decisions.
constitutional convent, referendum, muckraker, Senate, California, Progressivism, constitutional amendment, legislature
1. The Federalist papers; Alexander Hamilton, James Madison, John Jay, ed. Yakovlev N. N. Moscow: Ves Mir, 2000, 592. (In Russ.)
2. Makiavelly N. The Prince; The art of war; Discourses om the first decade of Titus Livius; The history of Florence. Moscow: Mysl, 2015, 398. (In Russ.)
3. Bybee Jay S. Ulysses at the mast: Democracy, federalism, and the sirens' song of the seventeenth amendment. Northwestern University Law Review, 1997, 91(2): 500–571.
4. Lloyd H. D. Wealth against commonwealth. New York: Harper & Brothers Publishers, 1899, 564.
5. Sogrin V. V. Central problems of American history. Moscow: Ves Mir, 2013, 352. (In Russ.) https://elibrary.ru/ttpwrh
6. Sogrin V. V. History of the USA. Moscow: Mezhdunar. otnosheniia, 2021, 600. (In Russ.)
7. Malakhovsky A. K. "The muckrakers": An impact on history of modern American journalism. Universum: Philology and art history, 2017, (12). (In Russ.) URL: http://7universum.com/ru/philology/archive/item/5378 (accessed 20 Nov 2023).
8. Sogrin V. V. Political history of the USA. XVII–XX centuries. Moscow: Ves Mir, 2001, 400. (In Russ.) https://elibrary.ru/qyyyht
9. Kosikhina S. S. Mendment of the constitution of the United States of America: The formal way. Vestnik Amurskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Seriia: Gumanitarnye nauki, 2023, (100): 21–24. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.22250/20730284_2023_100_21
10. Chechelev S. V. Ratifcation constitutional act as a form of legal development of the USA in modern history. Law enforcement in public and private law: Proc. Intern. Sci. Conf., Omsk, 29 Mar 2019. Omsk: OmSU, 2019, 16–18. (In Russ.) https://elibrary.ru/xcgphn
11. Melnikova Yu. D. Models and experiences of local civic initiative – implementation in the United States. Political science issues, 2021, 11(4): 1122–1131. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.35775/PSI.2021.68.4.018
12. Sullivan J. W. Direct legislation by the citizenship through the initiative and referendum. New York: True Nationalist Publishing Company, 1893, 126.
13. Smirnov I. V. Critical perception by the leaders of the populist party of the US Constitution (turn of the 19th–20th centuries). Tambov University Review. Series: Humanities, 2021, 26(195): 341–352. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.20310/1810-0201-2021-26-195-341-352
14. Kaufman J. Rise and fall of a nation of joiners: The knights of labor revisited. Journal of Interdisciplinary History, 2001, 31(4): 553–579. http://dx.doi.org/10.1162/00221950151115089
15. Commons J. R. History of labour in the United States. New York: The Macmillan Company, 1918, Vol. 2, 642.
16. Goodwyn L. The Populist moment: a short history of the agrarian revolt in America. New York: Oxford University Press, 1978, 384.
17. Clanton O. G. Populism: the humane preference in America, 1890–1900. Boston: Twayne Publishers, 1991, 199.
18. Burton H. The initiative and referendum and how Oregon got them. McClure`s Magazine, 1911, 37(3): 235–248.
19. Schmidt D. Citizen lawmakers: The ballot initiative revolution. Philadelphia: Temple University Press, 1972, 346.
20. Cronin T. E. Direct democracy: The politics of initiative, referendum, and recal. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1989, 290.
21. LaVally R. 200 Significant statutes and constitutional amendments of the 20th century. Laws of the Century, 1999, 31.
22. Rodes D. W. California women's suffrage campaign of 1911. Hayward: California State University, 1974, 209.
23. Cardinale K. A. Building a coalition in California: The 1911 campaign for women's suffrage. San Bernardino: California State University, 2022, 75.
24. Beard C. A., Schultz B. E. Documents on the state-wide initiative, referendum and recall. New York: The Macmillan company, 1912, 394.
25. Lafitsky V. I. Constitutional system of the USA. Moscow: Statut, 2011, 351. (In Russ.) https://elibrary.ru/qmbxxj
26. Gold M. Recall idea got its start in L.A. in 1898. Los Angelos Times, 2003. URL: https://www.latimes.com/archives/la-xpm-2003-jul-13-me-history13-story.html (accessed 15 Nov 2023).
27. Spivak J. Recall elections: From Alexander Hamilton to Gavin Newsom. Independently published, 2021, 100.
28. Hylton G. J. Who was gov. Lynn Joseph Frazier? Marquette University Law School, 2012. URL: https://law.marquette.edu/facultyblog/2012/07/who-was-gov-lynn-joseph-frazier/ (accessed 15 Nov 2023).
29. Salladay R. State of transition / End of the Davis era / Tempered temperament led state. Chronicle Staff Writer, 2003, (12). URL: https://www.sfgate.com/politics/article/STATE-OF-TRANSITION-End-of-the-Davis-era-2549307.php (accessed 15 Nov 2023).
30. Karlamangla S. Why do we have recalls? Thank Los Angeles. A brief history of the recall in California. The New York Times, 2021. URL: https://www.nytimes.com/2021/09/01/us/why-does-california-have-recalls.html (accessed 15 Nov 2023).
31. Markushina N. Y., Parfenenok N. L., Simonov D. P. Comparative analysis of US regions by actual and legal status of direct democracy. Original Research, 2023, 13(2): 112–122. (In Russ.) https://elibrary.ru/hewlbg
32. Szydlowski A. V. The legal status of election officials in the state of Montana. Legal Concept, 2019, 18(3): 137–144. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.15688/lc.jvolsu.2019.3.20
