Pushkin, Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Pushkin, Russian Federation
Pushkin, Russian Federation
The article introduces a comparative analysis of the component composition of milk obtained from Holstein cows and Saanen goats. The animals received an identical feed base under the same natural and climatic conditions (Leningrad Region, Russia). Monthly milk samples were tested for milk fat, protein, casein, lactose, and fatty acids using a FOSS 7 DSCC infrared analyzer. The cow’s milk was rich in fat, protein, casein, and lactose. The goat’s milk contained little saturated fatty acids, e.g., myristic, palmitic, and stearic. However, it was high in polyunsaturated and short-chain fatty acids. The milk of Saanen goats proved to have good prospects for the dairy industry, especially as part of functional food or infant formula.
fatty acids, lactose, dairy cattle
1. Prosser, C. G. Compositional and functional characteristics of goat milk and relevance as a base for infant formula / C. G. Prosser // J. Food Sci. 2021. Vol. 86. № 2. P. 257-265. https://www.doi.org/10.1111/1750-3841.15574
2. Gurova, M. M. Smesi na osnove koz'ego moloka. Komu, zachem, kak / M. M. Gurova // Medicinskiy sovet. 2022. № 1. S. 128-33. https://www.doi. org/10.21518/2079-701X-2022-16-1-128-133
3. Liu, Y. Comparison of whole goat milk and its major fractions regarding the modulation of gut microbiota / Y. Liu, F. Zhang // J. Sci. Food Agric. 2021. Vol. 102. № 9. P. 3618-3627. https://www.doi.org/doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/jsfa.11708
4. Haug, A. Bovine milk in human nutrition - a review / A. Haug, A.T. Høstmark, O.M. Harstad // Lipids Health Dis. 2007. Vol. 6. № 25. P. 6-25. https://www.doi.org/10.1186/1476-511X-6-25
5. Schönfeldt, H. C. The need for country specific composition data on milk / H. C.Schönfeldt, N. G. Hall, L. E. Smit // Food Res. Int. 2012. Vol. 47. № 2. P. 207-209. https://www.doi.org/10.1016/j.foodres.2011.05.018
6. Roy, D. Composition, structure, and digestive dynamics of milk from different species - A review / D. Roy, Ye. A. Moughan, P. J. Singh // Front. Nutr. 2020. Oct. 6. 7:577759. https://www.doi.org/10.3389/fnut.2020.577759
7. Ezhegodnik po plemennoy rabote v molochnom skotovodstve v hozyaystvah Rossiyskoy Federacii 2020 g. - M.: VNIIplem, 2021. - 265 s.
8. Ezhegodnik po plemennoy rabote v ovcevodstve i kozovodstve v hozyaystvah Rossiyskoy Federacii 2020 g. - M.: VNIIplem, 2021. - 320 s.
9. Stergiadis, S. Comparative nutrient profiling of retail goat and cow milk / S. Stergiadis, N. P. Nørskov, S. Purup [et al.] // Nutrients. 2019. Vol. 11. № 10. P. 2282. https://www.doi.org/10.3390/nu11102282
10. Ceballos, L. S. Composition of goat and cow milk produced under similar conditions and analyzed by identical methodology / L. S. Ceballos, E. R. Morales, de la Torre Adarve [et al.] // Journal of Food Composition and Analysis 2009. Vol. 22. № 4. P. 322-329. https://www.doi.org/10.1016/J.JFCA.2008.10.020
11. Francavilla, R. Effect of lactose on gut microbiota and metabolome of infants with cow’s milk allergy/ R.Francavilla, M.Calasso, L.Calace [et al.] // Pediatr. Allergy Immunol. 2012. Vol. 23. № 5. P. 420-427. https://www.doi.org/10.1111/j.1399-3038.2012.01286.x.
12. Meskina, E. R. Mal'absorbciya i neperenosimost' laktozy: sovremennaya koncepciya, diagnostika i klinicheskiy kontrol' / E.R.Meskina // Voprosy prakticheskoy pediatrii. 2019. T. 14. № 5. S. 39-57. https://www.doi.org/10.20953/1817-7646-2019-5-39-57.
13. Yang, J. Comparative milk fatty acid analysis of different dairy species / J. Yang, N. Zheng, J .Wang, Y. Yang // Int. J. Dairy Tech. 2018. Vol. 71. № 2. P. 544-550. https://www.doi.org/10.1111/1471-0307.12443
14. Wang, L. A high fat diet with a high C18:0/C16:0 ratio induced worse metabolic and transcriptomic profiles in C57BL/6 mice / L. Wang, F. Xu, Z. Song [et al.] // Lipids Health Dis. 2020. Vol. 19. № 1. https://www.doi.org/10.1186/s12944-020-01346-z
15. Camm, A. J. The ESC Textbook of Cardiovascular Medicine / A. J. Camm, T. F. Luscher, G. Maurer [et al.] // Oxford University Press. 2019. Vol. 1. P. 868-869. https://www.doi.org/10.4414/cvm.2018.00567