TRAINING FUTURE TEACHERS OF MATHEMATICS AND COMPUTER SCIENCE: EXPERIENCE, PROBLEMS, AND PROSPECTS
Abstract and keywords
Abstract (English):
ngineering, digital technologies, and fundamental sciences are experiencing personnel shortage. Profound mathematical education is the basis of fundamental and applied research. However, university applicants have recently been demonstrating poor results in Mathematics, probably, as a result of understaffing in schools. Schools need teachers of Mathematics and Computer Science with fundamental knowledge of the subject, advanced teaching methodology, and professional pedagogical competencies. The author examined the experience of teachers’ training at classical universities to profile a modern school teacher. Future teachers of Mathematics and Computer Science should not have to major in pedagogy: a block of pedagogical and methodical disciplines can be integrated into various curricula to provide university graduates with a teaching qualification. The article introduces some case studies and recommendations on how to improve teachers’ training in mathematics and computer science in the Kemerovo Region (Kuzbass).

Keywords:
professional training, competence, quality of training, pedagogical education, teachers’ training, academic process
Text
Text (PDF): Read Download
References

1. Semenov A. L., Abylkassymova A. E. Training the future mathematics teacher: The key to change. Lomonosov Pedagogical Education Journal, 2024, 22(2): 9–28. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.55959/LPEJ-24-13

2. Kondaurova I. K., Zaharova T. G., Guseva M. A. Regional experience training and professional formation of the future teacher of mathematics in the modernization of secondary and higher mathematical education. Baltic Humanitarian Journal, 2014, (4): 81–84. (In Russ.) https://elibrary.ru/tfaccl

3. Kaneva E. A. Analysis of the formation of special abilities of future teachers of mathematics and computer science. Moscow Pedagogical Journal, 2024, (1): 137–146. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.18384/2949-4974-2024-1-137-146

4. Shurko G. K. Principles of dovuzovsky preparation of future teachers of mathematics and informatics. Didactics of mathematics: Problems and Investigations, 2017, (46): 64–71. (In Russ.) https://elibrary.ru/yqrgwn

5. Shakirova L. R., Falileeva M. V. Digital competencies of a teacher of mathematics and computer science: Analysis of a survey of employers. Novye informatsionnye tekhnologii v obrazovanii i nauke, 2022, (5): 107–115. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.17853/2587-6910-2022-05-107-115

6. Glukhanyuk N. S. Psychological foundations of development of a teacher as a subject of professionalization. Dr. Psychol. Sci. Diss. Abstr. Ekaterinburg, 2001, 40. (In Russ.)

7. Komarevtseva E. A. Personal and professional maturity of a specialist. Ananyev Readings: Proc. Sci.-Prac. Conf., St. Petersburg, 24–26 Oct 2006. St. Petersburg: SPbSU, 2006, 257–259. (In Russ.)

8. Sinchukov A. V. Mathematical training of a modern teacher of mathematics and computer science. Innovation science, 2016, (11-1): 173–175. (In Russ.) https://elibrary.ru/wzuncr

9. Shurko G. K. Theoretical bases of preparation of the teacher with two profiles: Mathematics and computer science. Didactics of mathematics: Problems and Investigations, 2017, (45): 64–74. (In Russ.) https://elibrary.ru/foyhoc

10. Kalina I. I. Contribution of Lomonosov Moscow State University to formingthe country’s technological sovereignty by training teachers ofscience profile. Lomonosov Pedagogical Education Journal, 2022, 20(3): 56–64. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.51314/2073-2635-2022-3-56-64

11. Lebedeva O. V., Grebenev I. V., Avralev N. V., Chuprunov E. V. Training a physics teacher at a classical university: Historical experience and modern tasks. Pedagogical Education in Russia, 2024, (4): 290–296. (In Russ.) https://elibrary.ru/vtrorg

12. Malanov I. A. Problems of professional formation and development of modern young teachers. BSU bulletin. Education. Personality. Society, 2021, (3): 32–36. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.18101/2307-3330-2021-3-32-36

13. Presnyakova T. N., Ankudinova S. A., Nepochatykh I. A. The problem of conscious choice of teaching profession. Education. Science. Scientific personnel, 2019, (2): 209–216. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.24411/2073-3305-2019-10116

14. Fomina T. P., Karlova M. Yu. Study of the factors influencing the choice of profession and academic success of students specializing in "Pedagogical education" by means of the statistical analysis. Pedagogy. Theory & Practice, 2018, (2): 59–63. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.30853/pedagogy.2018-2.13

15. Keiv M. A., Zhuravleva N. A. Assessment of readiness of first- and second-year students, future teachers of mathematics, to master vocation-related subjects at university. Bulletin of Krasnoyarsk State Pedagogical University named after V. P. Astafyev, 2023, (1): 90–99. (In Russ.) https://elibrary.ru/prsnnu

16. Mikheeva T. B. "Competence" and "competency": On the issue of using concepts in modern Russian education. Scientific notes of the Transbaikal State Humanitarian and Pedagogical University named after N. G. Chernyshevsky, 2011, (5): 110–114. (In Russ.) https://elibrary.ru/ookfyr

17. Evdokimova V. E., Ustinova N. N. Competence and contextual approach in pedagogical training of future teachers of informatics, mathematics and physics. The world of science, culture and education, 2021, (6): 110–112. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.24412/1991-5497-2021-691-110-112

18. Tikhonova Yu. V. Chapter I. Professional competence of the teacher in the development of student’s personality at school and at home. Modern Science in Theory and Practice, ed. Vartanova M. L. Moscow: Pero, 2020, 6–42. (In Russ.) https://elibrary.ru/aiwszf

19. Ananyev B. G. Person as an object of knowledge. St. Petersburg: Piter, 2001, 272. (In Russ.)

20. Kutumova A. A., Shebanova L. P. Technology education in two-level system of pedagogical personnel’s training. Modern problems of science and education, 2014, (5). (In Russ.) URL: https://science-education.ru/ru/article/view?id=15206 (Accessed 10 Oct 2024).

21. Portnova A. G., Lesnikova S. L., Rusakova N. A. Mathematical methods in monitoring the quality of student performance. Vestnik Kemerovskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Seriia: Gumanitarnye i obshchestvennye nauki, 2020, 4(3): 218–226. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.21603/2542-1840-2020-4-3-218-226

22. Shadrikov V. D. A new model of a specialist, innovative training, and a competency-based approach. Higher education today, 2004, (8): 26–31. (In Russ.) https://elibrary.ru/skglqx

23. Volkov A. I., Lukin V. N., Chernyshov L. N. Is the "Inverted" Curriculum solution or problem? Modeling and Data Analysis, 2023, 13(2): 206–214. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.17759/mda.2023130212

24. Glukhova O. Yu., Smolentsev N. K. Implementation of project-based learning at the university. Topical issues of science and technology: Problems, forecasts, and prospects: Proc. II Nation. Conf., Kemerovo, 15 Oct 2020. Kemerovo: KemSU, 2020, 9. (In Russ.) https://elibrary.ru/mohiiu

25. Burzalova T. V. On substantial continuity of mathematical preparation of future teacher of mathematics and computer science. Bulletin of the Buryat State University, 2011, (15): 17–20. (In Russ.) https://elibrary.ru/okiyqh


Login or Create
* Forgot password?