Kemerovo, Russian Federation
Kemerovo, Russian Federation
The rapid technological development has introduced artificial intelligence (AI) to creative industries. As a result, institutions of copyright and neighboring, or related, rights are facing new challenges that require new legal approaches. The authors examined various copyright issues connected with works of art generated with the help of digital algorithms and machine learning. The analysis of the current laws in this sphere revealed new models that could accommodate the specifics of digital content within the legal domain. The authorship of AI-generated works can belong to the developer of the AI, the user who initiated the process, or the AI unit itself. Automated data extraction increases the risk of infringement, often leading to disputes between rights holders and users. The transformation of copyright and related laws caused by digitalization is a complex and multifaceted process that challenges legislators and law enforcement agencies. It is bound to replace the current approaches to the copyright and neighboring rights.
copyright and neighboring rights, digital environment, artificial intelligence, creative activity, authorship, AI unit, information use, parsing
1. Ivliev G. P., Egorova M. A. Legal issues of the legal status of artificial intelligence and products created by artificial intelligence systems. Journal of Russian Law, 2022, 26(6): 32–46. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.12737/jrl.2022.060
2. Schwab K. Technologies of the fourth industrial revolution. Moscow: Eksmo, 2016, 416. (In Russ.)
3. Maslov V. I., Lukyanov I. V. The fourth industrial revolution: Origins and consequences. Bulletin of the Moscow University. Series 27: Globalistics and geopolitics, 2017, (2): 38–48. (In Russ.) https://elibrary.ru/ytobwt
4. Bliznets I. A., Gavrilov E. P., Dobrynin O. V., Kitayskiy V. E., Leontyev K. B., Mukhamedshin I. S., Orlova V. V., Sinelnikova V. N., Tytskaya G. I. Intellectual property law. 2nd ed. Moscow: Prospect, 2024, 896. (In Russ.) https://elibrary.ru/iycprb
5. Galkin N. A. Creative work as the main criterion of the copyright item’s protectability. In: Bogustov A. A., Shcherbak N. V. et al. Intellectual rights in the digital age: Selected aspects. Moscow: GAUGN, 2023, 113–121. (In Russ.) https://elibrary.ru/zuovxs
6. Taran K. K. Prerequisites for the legal regulation of intellectual activity results created by using artificial intelligence. Law and Economics, 2023, (1): 20–26. (In Russ.) https://elibrary.ru/gqgqmw
7. Kuteynikov D. L., Izhaev O. A., Zenin S. S., Lebedev V. A. The nature and legal features of cyber-physical, cyber-biological and artificial cognitive systems. Russian law: Education, Practice, Researches, 2019, (3): 75–81. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.34076/2410-2709-2019-3-75-81
8. Shevchenko O. A. Intelligent robot as the author of a work or invention. Review of the scientific monograph P. M. Morgan "Intellectual property law and artificial intelligence". Law & Legislation, 2018, (8): 176–178. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.24411/2073-3313-2018-10131
9. Vitko V. Analysis of scientific views of authorship and right for results of AI activity (continued). Intellektualnaja sobstvennost. Avtorskoe pravo i smezhnye prava, 2019, (3): 5–22. (In Russ.) https://elibrary.ru/jsfbce
10. Entin V. L. Copyright in virtual reality: New opportunities and challenges of the digital age. Moscow: Statut, 2017, 216. (In Russ.) https://elibrary.ru/xrvvhz
11. Melnikova E. N. Embeddability of the concept of an electronic person in the legal system of the state or state entity. Russian Juridical Journal, 2022, (2): 94–112. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.34076/20713797_2022_2_94
12. Vaypan V. A. Digital law: Origins, concept and place in the legal system. Law and Economics, 2024, (1): 5–27. (In Russ.) https://elibrary.ru/eondkz
13. Morkhat P. M. Artificial intelligence unit as electronic personality. Bulletin of Moscow State Regional University. Series: Jurisprudence, 2018, (2): 61–73. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.18384/2310-6794-2018-2-61-73
14. Morkhat P. M. Legal personality of artificial intelligence unit: Some civil-legal approaches. Vestnik of Kostroma State University, 2018, 24(3): 280–283. (In Russ.) https://elibrary.ru/yoiokl
15. Vashenyak N. E. Artificial intelligence and copyrights: International experience, ethical dilemmas, and regulation in Russia. Vestnik nauki, 2024, 3(3): 171–181. (In Russ.) https://elibrary.ru/qnlmje
16. Pleshakov E. A., Prosvirnina M. I. The problem of authorship of a work created by a neural network. Education and Law, 2023, (7): 408–411. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.24412/2076-1503-2023-7-408-411
17. Ostanina E. A. Special aspects of online creativity and new forms of co-authorship. In: Bogustov A. A., Shcherbak N. V., Nikiforov A. A. et al. Intellectual rights in the digital age: selected aspects. Moscow: GAUGN, 2023, 124–139. (In Russ.) https://elibrary.ru/vmlcsz
18. Safin R. R., Maskin K. A., Povarov Yu. S. Legal regulation of copyright objects created using "neural network". Legal regulation of intellectual property and innovation, ed. Sushkova O. V. Moscow: RG-Press, 2018, 154–158. (In Russ.) https://elibrary.ru/xzuimh
19. Rozhkova M. A., Isaeva O. V. Qualifying objects based on machine learning results and artificial intelligence "works" as derivative works. In: Bogustov A. A., Shcherbak N. V., Nikiforov A. A. et al. Intellectual rights in the digital age: Selected aspects. Moscow: GAUGN, 2023, 153–172. (In Russ.) https://elibrary.ru/gyrotn
20. Channov S. E. Robot (artificial intelligence system) as a subject (quasi-subject) of law. Actual problems of Russian law, 2022, 17(12): 94–109. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.17803/1994-1471.2022.145.12.094-109
21. Churilov A. Yu., Trynchenkov N. A. Protectability of results created with artificial intelligence. In: Bogustov A. A., Shcherbak N. V., Nikiforov A. A. et al. Intellectual rights in the digital age: Selected aspects. Moscow: GAUGN, 2023, 140–152. (In Russ.) https://elibrary.ru/oenvpl
22. Lukashova A. V. Copyright and works generated by a neural network. Issues of Russian justice, 2023, (28): 122–132. (In Russ.) https://elibrary.ru/vkeoed
23. Gurko A. V. Artificial intelligence and copyright: A look into the future. Intellektualnaja sobstvennost. Avtorskoe pravo i smezhnye prava, 2017, (12): 7–18. (In Russ.) https://elibrary.ru/zukikl
24. Boykov V. A. Copyright in the digital age. International Journal of Humanities and Natural Sciences, 2021, (10-2): 150–152. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.24412/2500-1000-2021-10-2-150-152
25. Kalyatin V. O. To what extent can the contentof databases be used: Some problems and perspectives. Law, 2023, (5): 53–63. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.37239/0869-4400-2023-20-5-53-63
26. Menshikov Ya. S. Advantages of automatic data collection in the internet over manual data collection. Universum: Technical sciences, 2022, (10-1): 33–36. (In Russ.) https://elibrary.ru/pwaetv
27. Vorozhevich A. S. Boundaries of allied rights. Intellektualnaja sobstvennost. Avtorskoe pravo i smezhnye prava, 2019, (11): 29–42. (In Russ.) https://elibrary.ru/uirmge
28. Rozhkova M. A. Resolving the issue of the legality of parsing (scraping) in the VKontakte vs. Double Data case. Comment on the practice of considering economic disputes: Judicial arbitration practice, ed. Zhuikov V. M. Moscow: IZISP pri Pravitelstve RF; Juridicheskaja firma Kontrakt, 2020, iss. 27, 67–81. (In Russ.)
